LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Racial/ethnic disparities in access and outcomes of simultaneous liver-kidney transplant among liver transplant candidates with renal dysfunction in the United States.

Photo from wikipedia

BACKGROUND Since the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) allocation system was implemented, the proportion of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) has increased significantly. However, whether racial/ethnic disparities exist in access… Click to show full abstract

BACKGROUND Since the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) allocation system was implemented, the proportion of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) has increased significantly. However, whether racial/ethnic disparities exist in access to SLKT and post-SLKT survival remains understudied. METHODS A retrospective cohort of patients age ≥18 with renal dysfunction on the liver transplant (LT) waiting list was obtained from Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Renal dysfunction was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73m at listing for LT. Multilevel time-to-competing-events regression adjusting for center effect was used to examine the likelihood of receiving SLKT. Inverse probability of treatment weighted survival analyses were used to analyze post-transplant mortality outcomes. RESULTS For patients with renal dysfunction at listing for LT, not listed for simultaneous kidney transplant, non-Hispanic black (NHB) and Hispanic patients were more likely to receive SLKT than non-Hispanic white (NHW) patients (NHB: multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio, aHR 2.57; 95% confidence interval, CI 1.42-4.65; Hispanic: aHR 2.03; 95% CI 1.14-3.60). For post-SLKT outcomes, compared to NHW patients, NHB patients had a lower mortality risk prior to 24 months (aHR 0.80; 95% CI 0.65-0.97), but had a higher mortality risk (aHR 2.00; 95% CI 1.59-2.55) afterwards; in contrast, Hispanic patients had a lower overall mortality risk than NHW patients (aHR 0.61; 95% CI 0.51-0.74). CONCLUSIONS In the MELD era, racial/ethnic differences exist in access and survival of SLKT for patients with renal dysfunction at listing for LT. Future studies are warranted to examine whether these differences remain in the post-SLK allocation policy era.

Keywords: renal dysfunction; transplant; liver; slkt; racial ethnic

Journal Title: Transplantation
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.