BACKGROUND Hepatitis C virus-positive (HCV+) kidney transplant (KT) recipients are at increased risks of rejection and graft failure. The optimal induction agent for this population remains controversial, particularly regarding concerns… Click to show full abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatitis C virus-positive (HCV+) kidney transplant (KT) recipients are at increased risks of rejection and graft failure. The optimal induction agent for this population remains controversial, particularly regarding concerns that anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) might increase HCV-related complications. METHODS Using SRTR and Medicare claims data, we studied 6780 HCV+ and 139,681 HCV- KT recipients in 1999-2016 who received ATG or interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL2RA) for induction. We first examined the association of recipient HCV status with receiving ATG (vs. IL2RA) using multilevel logistic regression. Then, we studied the association of ATG (vs. IL2RA) with KT outcomes (rejection, graft failure, and death) and hepatic complications (liver transplant registration and cirrhosis) among HCV+ recipients using logistic and Cox regression. RESULTS HCV+ recipients were less likely to receive ATG than HCV- recipients (living donor, aOR=0.640.770.91; deceased donor, aOR=0.710.810.92). In contrast, HCV+ recipients who received ATG were at lower risk of acute rejection compared to those who received IL2RA (1-year crude incidence=11.6% vs. 12.6%; aOR=0.680.820.99). There was no significant difference in the risks of graft failure (aHR=0.861.001.17), death (aHR=0.850.951.07), liver transplant registration (aHR=0.580.971.61), and cirrhosis (aHR=0.730.921.16). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that ATG, as compared to IL2RA, may lower the risk of acute rejection without increasing hepatic complications in HCV+ KT recipients. Given the higher rates of acute rejection in this population, ATG appears to be safe and reasonable for HCV+ recipients.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.