LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Comparing activated brain regions between noisy and conventional galvanic vestibular stimulation using functional magnetic resonance imaging

Photo from wikipedia

Objective Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) enhances vestibular sensory inputs in vestibular afferents. However, it is unclear whether noisy and conventional GVS activate different regions of the brain. The purpose of… Click to show full abstract

Objective Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) enhances vestibular sensory inputs in vestibular afferents. However, it is unclear whether noisy and conventional GVS activate different regions of the brain. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in activated brain regions between those two interventions using functional MRI (fMRI). Methods Twenty-four healthy volunteers who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were randomly assigned to the noisy GVS or conventional GVS groups. Brain activity was measured during stimulation and compared with that during resting fMRI. This study used a blocked design comprising four task-rest blocks, each consisting of a 30-s period of vestibular stimulation followed by a 30-s period of rest. We evaluated the differences in contrast images between the noisy and conventional GVS groups. Results The noisy GVS group showed significantly increased activation in the vestibular system-related brain regions, including the insula and central operculum. The conventional GVS group showed significant activity in multisensory areas, including the supramarginal gyrus, central operculum and opercular part of the inferior frontal gyrus. Thus, the noisy GVS group showed significantly increased activity in the insula, putamen and central operculum compared with the conventional GVS group. Conclusions Noisy GVS could increase brain activity in the insular peripheral region compared to conventional GVS. Our results extend the literature about the importance of the stochastic resonance of noise addition for the vestibular system.

Keywords: vestibular stimulation; gvs; conventional gvs; noisy conventional; brain

Journal Title: NeuroReport
Year Published: 2021

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.