Photo from academic.microsoft.com
Parfenova et al. state in [Phys. Rev. C 98, 034608 (2018)] that the results presented by Casal et al. [Phys. Rev. C 94, 054622 (2016)] concerning the radiative capture for… Click to show full abstract
Parfenova et al. state in [Phys. Rev. C 98, 034608 (2018)] that the results presented by Casal et al. [Phys. Rev. C 94, 054622 (2016)] concerning the radiative capture for $^{17}\mathrm{Ne}$ formation are incorrect and their conclusions erroneous mainly because of two reasons: (1) it is ``expressed'' that the resonant rate is not important for $^{15}\mathrm{O}(2p,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{17}\mathrm{Ne}$ since it is negligibly small compared with the nonresonant contribution to the rate, and (2) the electromagnetic dipole cross section predicted is dramatically different from the available experimental data for $^{17}\mathrm{Ne}+^{208}\mathrm{Pb}$ at 500 MeV/u [Phys. Lett. B 759, 200 (2016)]. We demonstrate here that these conclusions are incorrectly extracted from our work.
Journal Title: Physical Review C
Year Published: 2020
Link to full text (if available)
Share on Social Media: Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!