This study of 3-(5-phenyl-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-2H-chromen-2-one, C17H10N2O3, 1, and 3-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]-2H-chromen-2-one, C16H9N3O3, 2, was performed on the assumption of the potential anticancer activity of the compounds. Three polymorphic structures for 1 and two… Click to show full abstract
This study of 3-(5-phenyl-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-2H-chromen-2-one, C17H10N2O3, 1, and 3-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]-2H-chromen-2-one, C16H9N3O3, 2, was performed on the assumption of the potential anticancer activity of the compounds. Three polymorphic structures for 1 and two polymorphic structures for 2 have been studied thoroughly. The strongest intermolecular interaction is stacking of the `head-to-head' type in all the studied crystals. The polymorphic structures of 1 differ with respect to the intermolecular interactions between stacked columns. Two of the polymorphs have a columnar or double columnar type of crystal organization, while the third polymorphic structure can be classified as columnar-layered. The difference between the two structures of 2 is less pronounced. Both crystals can be considered as having very similar arrangements of neighbouring columns. The formation of polymorphic modifications is caused by a subtle balance of very weak intermolecular interactions and packing differences can be identified only using an analysis based on a study of the pairwise interaction energies.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.