LAUSR

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the different analytical methods used to predict the performance of seaplanes to define the weaknesses in each method and be able to extend the analytical approach to include the nonlinear terms (unsteadiness). Design/methodology/approach First, the elemental hydrodynamic characteristics of seaplanes are discussed. Second, five different analytical methods are reviewed. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are stated. After that, the heave and pitch equations of seaplane motion are illustrated. The procedure of obtaining the solution of the heave and pitch equations of seaplane motion is explained. Finally, the results obtained from the most common methods are compared. Findings The results show that the methods are based on different assumptions and considerations. As a result, no method is optimal for all types of seaplanes. Moreover, some of the analytical methods do not study the stability of the seaplane, which is a major issue in the design of seaplanes. In addition, all methods consider the motion as steady and linear. The objective is to extend the work to include the nonlinear effects. Originality/value This paper presents some of the analytical methods used in describing the performance of seaplanes and explains how can they be applied. Moreover, it summarises the advantages and disadvantages of each method.