LAUSR

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a commentary on Banks et al., and sets the wider context. Design/methodology/approach It provides a brief narrative review of the literature on the factors that determine the quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities, including the impact of culture. Findings Key to ensuring good quality of life outcomes is support that is facilitative, enabling and empowering which can compensate for severity of disability and improve people’s experiences. This approach is called Active Support. Improving quality of life is a key part of preventing and responding to behaviours that challenge. Culture is an important factor in ensuring staff are motivated to work in such ways but is likely to be intertwined with many other factors. Originality/value This paper summarises the key literature on what is needed to improve outcomes for people with intellectual disabilities. It introduces the importance of exploring how the different dimensions of culture interact and how culture, practice, processes and structures might work in a much more complex and intertwined fashion than previously conceptualised.