LAUSR

Improving the resilience of the power distribution networks is becoming a top priority for the utility companies. Robustness is a key part of resilience, and is often studied through failure-based analysis. Furthermore, with the increasingly dynamic nature of the grid, voltage fluctuation is an important factor to consider while assessing system robustness. Very few metrics exist for capturing robustness to voltage fluctuations, primarily due to their complex computation process. While several failure-based robustness metrics have been proposed in the literature, there is no strict consensus regarding the applicability of these metrics. Therefore, this paper addresses two key gaps in robustness analysis of power distribution networks. First, this paper presents a systematic study of different failure-based robustness metrics by comparing their similarity and dissimilarity in ranking critical nodes of the power distribution network. Secondly, the efficacy of these metrics in characterizing voltage fluctuations is evaluated by comparing their ranking to that of voltage influencing scores. From experimental results, it is shown that hybrid failure-based metrics can quantify voltage fluctuations to a reasonable extent. We highlight the major shortcomings of current metric formulations and discuss possible future research directions related to robustness characteristics and analysis.