LAUSR

Evolutionary multiobjective algorithms have become a popular choice to tackle the clustering problem. On the one hand, the simultaneous optimization of complementary clustering criteria offers an increased robustness to changes in data characteristics. On the other hand, the evolutionary search is able to approximate the Pareto optimal front and deliver a set of trade-offs between these criteria in a single algorithm execution. Decision making is the concluding stage of the pipeline, having as its goal the selection of a single, final solution from the set of candidate trade-offs produced. This is a complex task for which a definitive answer does not seem to be available, as the underlying assumptions of existing techniques may not hold for all applications. In this paper, we investigate an alternative approach to address this challenge: posing it as a learning problem. The key idea is to build a model that, given a proper characterization of solutions and their context (defined by the full approximation solution set and the specific clustering task at hand), is able to estimate quality and facilitate the identification of the best choice. To evaluate the suitability of this approach, we conduct a series of experiments over diverse synthetic and real-world datasets, including comparisons against a range of representative decision-making strategies from the literature. Our proposal exhibits greater flexibility in dealing with problems of varying characteristics, consistently outperforming the reference methods considered. This study demonstrates that it is possible to learn from the decision-making process in example settings and generalize the acquired knowledge to new scenarios.