In the past several years, it has become apparent that the effectiveness of Pareto-dominance-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithms deteriorates progressively as the number of objectives in the problem, given by M,… Click to show full abstract
In the past several years, it has become apparent that the effectiveness of Pareto-dominance-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithms deteriorates progressively as the number of objectives in the problem, given by M, grows. This is mainly due to the poor discriminability of Pareto optimality in many-objective spaces (typically M≥4). As a consequence, research efforts have been driven in the general direction of developing solution ranking methods that do not rely on Pareto dominance (e.g., decomposition-based techniques), which can provide sufficient selection pressure. However, it is still a nontrivial issue for many existing non-Pareto-dominance-based evolutionary algorithms to deal with unknown irregular Pareto front shapes. In this article, a new many-objective evolutionary algorithm based on the generalization of Pareto optimality (GPO) is proposed, which is simple, yet effective, in addressing many-objective optimization problems. The proposed algorithm used an ``(M-1)+1'' framework of GPO dominance, (M-1)-GPD for short, to rank solutions in the environmental selection step, in order to promote convergence and diversity simultaneously. To be specific, we apply M symmetrical cases of (M-1)-GPD, where each enhances the selection pressure of M-1 objectives by expanding the dominance area of solutions, while remaining unchanged for the one objective left out of that process. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed algorithm is very competitive with the state-of-the-art methods to which it is compared, on a variety of scalable benchmark problems. Moreover, experiments on three real-world problems have verified that the proposed algorithm can outperform the others on each of these problems.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.