LAUSR

This paper addresses the questions and concerns raised in the comment paper entitled “Comments on ‘Traffic Sign Recognition Using Kernel Extreme Leaning Machines With Deep Perceptual Features”’. It is analyzed that the major questions and concerns in the comment paper are due to some misunderstanding on the statements and the main contributions of the original paper by Zeng et al.. The main clarifications are as follows: (1) The weight update rule used by Zeng et al. is a standard form of kernel extreme learning machine (KELM) but not the rule of reduced KELM mentioned by the comment paper. (2) The aim and main contribution of the original paper by Zeng et al. are to improve the classification precision of traffic sign recognition (TSR) based on convolutional neural networks without dramatically increasing the scale or complexity of the deep neural network model, which leads to a relatively less training cost. The authors of the comment paper focused on the reduction of KELM’s computational costs but it is beyond the topic of the original paper. In addition, the reduction of KELM’s computational costs has been well studied in the literature. (3) The supplementary experiment is provided to show that the TSR method proposed by Zeng et al. is valid whether or not the training samples are much more than the needed kernels.