LAUSR

With the evolution of the online advertisement and tracking ecosystem, content-blockers have become the reference tool for improving the security, privacy and browsing experience when surfing the Internet. It is also commonly believed that using content-blockers to stop unsolicited content decreases the time needed for loading websites. In this work, we perform a large-scale study on the actual improvements of using content-blockers in terms of performance and quality of experience. For measuring it, we analyze the page size and loading times of the 100K most popular websites, as well as the most relevant QoE metrics, such as the Speed Index, Time to Interactive or the Cumulative Layout Shift, for the subset of the top 10K of them. Our experiments show that using content-blockers results in small improvements in terms of performance. However, contrary to popular belief, this has a negligible impact in terms of loading time and quality of experience. Moreover, in the case of small and lightweight websites, the overhead introduced by content-blockers can even result in decreased performance. Finally, we evaluate the improvement in terms of QoE based on the Mean Opinion Score (MOS) and find that two of the three studied content-blockers present an overall decrease between 3% and 5% instead of the expected improvement.