Haptic research has frequently equated softness with the compliance of elastic objects. However, in a recent study we have suggested that compliance is not the only perceived material dimension underlying… Click to show full abstract
Haptic research has frequently equated softness with the compliance of elastic objects. However, in a recent study we have suggested that compliance is not the only perceived material dimension underlying what is commonly called softness [1 ]. Here, we investigate, whether the different perceptual dimensions of softness affect how materials are haptically explored. Specifically, we tested whether also the task, i.e., the attribute that a material is being judged on, might affect how a material is explored. To this end we selected 15 adjectives and 19 materials that each associate with different softness dimensions for the study. In the experiment, while participants freely explored and rated the materials, we recorded their hand movements. These movements were subsequently categorized into distinct exploratory procedures (EPs) and analyzed in a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The results of this analysis suggest that the pattern of EPs depended not only on the material's softness dimension and the task (i.e., what attributes were rated), but also on an interaction between the two factors. Taken together, our findings support the notion of multiple perceptual dimensions of softness and suggest that participants actively adapt their EPs in a nuanced way when judging a particular softness dimensions for a given material.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.