LAUSR

The accuracy of an explicit traveltime‐offset approximation affects the results of the velocity analysis that plays a crucial role in the seismic data processing. Seismic anisotropy is important to account for large offset and azimuth since it can provide detailed information comparing with the isotropic assumption. For the perturbation‐based method, different traveltime approximation forms result in different accuracy. It is necessary to find the optimal traveltime approximation for specific signs and magnitudes of the anellipticity and different offset ranges. In this paper, a series of perturbation‐based traveltime approximations from different acoustic assumptions and parameterizations are specified. The perturbation coefficients are derived from the corresponding acoustic eikonal equations. We test the accuracy of the defined perturbation approximations in four homogeneous transversely isotropic medium with vertical symmetry axis (VTI) medium with a different set of anisotropy parameters and one multilayered transversely isotropic medium with vertical symmetry axis medium. The sensitivity in anellipticity for different approximations is also analysed. We find that different approximation achieves different accuracy under the circumstance of specific offset range and the value of anellipticity. Therefore, the optimal approximation form with higher accuracy can be selected based on different offset ranges and the magnitudes of anellipticity.