Photo from academic.microsoft.com
The letter 1 regarding our paper “Cascading bias of initial exposure to information at the crime scene to the subsequent evaluation of skeletal remains” 2 raises concerns that go beyond… Click to show full abstract
The letter 1 regarding our paper “Cascading bias of initial exposure to information at the crime scene to the subsequent evaluation of skeletal remains” 2 raises concerns that go beyond the specifics of the method employed in the research and the conclusions drawn. It touches upon some broader and basic issues about doing research that addresses forensic decision‐making. We start by briefly addressing the broader issues, before addressing the specific aim, method, and conclusions presented in the study in question 2.
Keywords:
forensic decision;
research;
authors response;
response research;
decision making
Journal Title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
Year Published: 2018
Link to full text (if available)
Share on Social Media: Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!
Journal Title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
Year Published: 2018
Link to full text (if available)
Share on Social Media: Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!