LAUSR

BACKGROUND Fluid therapy during major surgery can be managed by providing repeated bolus infusions until stroke volume no longer increases by ≥ 10%. However, the final bolus in an optimization round increases stroke volume by < 10% and is not necessary. We studied how different cut-off values for the hemodynamic indications given by esophagus Doppler monitoring, as well as augmentation by pulse oximetry, are associated with a higher or smaller chance that stroke volume increases by ≥ 10% (fluid responsiveness) before fluid is infused. METHODS An esophagus Doppler and a pulse oximeter that displayed the pleth variability index were used to monitor the effects of a bolus infusion in 108 patients undergoing goal-directed fluid therapy during major open abdominal surgery. RESULTS The analyzed data set comprised 266 bolus infusions. The overall incidence of fluid responsiveness was 44%, but this varied greatly depending on pre-infusion hemodynamics. The likelihood of being fluid-responsive was 30%-38% in the presence of stroke volume > 80 mL, corrected flow time > 360 ms, or pleth variability index < 10%. The likelihood was 21% if stroke volume had decreased by <8% since the previous optimization, which decreased to 0% if combined with stroke volume > 100 mL. By contrast, the likelihood of fluid responsiveness increased to 50%-55% when stroke volume ≤ 50 mL, corrected flow time ≤ 360 ms, or pleth variability index ≥ 10. A decrease in stroke volume by > 8% since the previous optimization was followed by a 58% likelihood of fluid responsiveness that, in combination with any of the other hemodynamic variables, increased to 66%-76%. CONCLUSIONS Single or combined hemodynamic variables provided by esophagus Doppler monitoring and pulse oximetry derived pleth variability index could help clinicians avoid unnecessary fluid bolus infusions.