The prevalence and long‐term impact of T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) is poorly defined in the modern era of tacrolimus/mycophenolate‐based maintenance therapy. This observational study evaluated 775 kidney transplant recipients with… Click to show full abstract
The prevalence and long‐term impact of T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) is poorly defined in the modern era of tacrolimus/mycophenolate‐based maintenance therapy. This observational study evaluated 775 kidney transplant recipients with serial histology and correlated TCMR events with the risk of graft loss. After a ~30% incidence of a first Banff Borderline or greater TCMR detected on for‐cause (17%) or surveillance (13%) biopsies, persistent (37.4%) or subsequent (26.3%) TCMR occurred in 64% of recipients on follow‐up biopsies. Alloimmune risk categories based on the HLA‐DR/DQ single molecule eplet molecular mismatch correlated with the number of TCMR events (p = .002) and Banff TCMR grade (p = .007). Both a first and second TCMR event correlated with death‐censored and all‐cause graft loss when adjusted for baseline covariates and other significant time‐dependent covariates such as DGF and ABMR. Therefore, a substantial portion of kidney transplant recipients, especially those with intermediate and high HLA‐DR/DQ molecular mismatch scores, remain under‐immunosuppressed, which in turn identifies the need for novel agents that can more effectively prevent or treat TCMR.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.