Although early studies suggest the Acuity Circles (AC) allocation policy has increased access to deceased donor liver transplants (DDLTs) for patients with the highest MELD scores, changes in center‐ and… Click to show full abstract
Although early studies suggest the Acuity Circles (AC) allocation policy has increased access to deceased donor liver transplants (DDLTs) for patients with the highest MELD scores, changes in center‐ and region‐level practices among patients with the highest MELD scores in response to AC are not well‐characterized. OPTN/UNOS data were analyzed to compare center‐level changes in the number of DDLTs based on allocation‐MELD (aMELD) categories used for AC sharing performed in the 18‐month periods before and after AC enactment on February 4, 2020. There was large center‐level variation in the number and proportion of aMELD ≥ 37 DDLTs performed from pre‐AC to AC period; 13 centers accounted for 196 of the 198 total net increase in aMELD ≥ 37 DDLTs performed after AC, 5 of these being from UNOS region 5. Similar center‐level variation was seen for MELD 33–36 and MELD 29–32 DDLTs, with 17 centers and 14 centers, respectively, accounting for the entire net increase in DDLTs in the aMELD categories. In conclusion, AC increased access to livers for transplantation for high MELD patients nationally, but imbalances remain in transplant practice patterns at the center and regional levels. Longer‐term study is necessary to assess effectiveness of AC in improving equitability of liver transplantations.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.