LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Neuromodulation in drug‐resistant epilepsy: A review of current knowledge

Photo from wikipedia

Nearly 1% of the global population suffers from epilepsy. Drug‐resistant epilepsy (DRE) affects one‐third of epileptic patients who are unable to treat their condition with existing drugs. For the treatment… Click to show full abstract

Nearly 1% of the global population suffers from epilepsy. Drug‐resistant epilepsy (DRE) affects one‐third of epileptic patients who are unable to treat their condition with existing drugs. For the treatment of DRE, neuromodulation offers a lot of potential. The background, mechanism, indication, application, efficacy, and safety of each technique are briefly described in this narrative review, with an emphasis on three approved neuromodulation therapies: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT‐DBS), and closed‐loop responsive neurostimulation (RNS). Neuromodulatory approaches involving direct or induced electrical currents have been developed to lessen seizure frequency and duration in patients with DRE since the notion of electrical stimulation as a therapy for neurologic diseases originated in the early nineteenth century. Although few people have attained total seizure independence for more than 12 months using these treatments, more than half have benefitted from a 50% drop in seizure frequency over time. Although promising outcomes in adults and children with DRE have been achieved, challenges such as heterogeneity among epilepsy types and etiologies, optimization of stimulation parameters, a lack of biomarkers to predict response to neuromodulation therapies, high‐level evidence to aid decision‐making, and direct comparisons between neuromodulatory approaches remain. To solve these existing gaps, authorize new kinds of neuromodulation, and develop personalized closed‐loop treatments, further research is needed. Finally, both invasive and non‐invasive neuromodulation seems to be safe. Implantation‐related adverse events for invasive stimulation primarily include infection and pain at the implant site. Intracranial hemorrhage is a frequent adverse event for DBS and RNS. Other stimulation‐specific side‐effects are mild with non‐invasive stimulation.

Keywords: resistant epilepsy; neuromodulation; stimulation; drug resistant

Journal Title: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.