LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Food and Drug Administration vs European Medicines Agency: Review times and clinical evidence on novel drugs at the time of approval

Photo from wikipedia

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) now have expedited review procedures for new drugs. We compared the review times of medicines licensed by the 2… Click to show full abstract

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) now have expedited review procedures for new drugs. We compared the review times of medicines licensed by the 2 agencies and explored differences in the evidence submitted. In 2015-2017 the FDA licensed 113 drugs, 66 of which reached Europe. The median review time was longer at the EMA than FDA and was shorter for drugs undergoing FDA-expedited programmes compared to the same drugs approved by the EMA through the standard procedure. We identified differences regarding the evidence submitted to the 2 regulators for 7 drugs. The greater use of expedited programmes by the FDA and administrative time at the European Commission mainly explain the later access of new drugs to the European market. The additional evidence submitted to the EMA is generally scant and limited to a few drugs.

Keywords: drug administration; time; review; european medicines; food drug; evidence

Journal Title: British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.