LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Usefulness of the ‘two‐step method’ of digital follow‐up for early‐stage melanoma detection in high‐risk French patients: a retrospective 4‐year study

Photo by markusspiske from unsplash

Dermoscopy was proven more accurate than naked-eye examination and sequential digital dermoscopy imaging (SDDI) superior to dermoscopy alone for melanoma detection2 . SDDI combined with total-body photography (TBP)3 namely the… Click to show full abstract

Dermoscopy was proven more accurate than naked-eye examination and sequential digital dermoscopy imaging (SDDI) superior to dermoscopy alone for melanoma detection2 . SDDI combined with total-body photography (TBP)3 namely the "two-step method" of digital follow-up (DFU), seems at present the best surveillance strategy for high risk patients. With the aim to endorse its usefulness, we retrospectively studied 148 at high risk patients included in DFU at the Dermato-oncology Unit of Hôpital Saint-Louis between 2014 and 2018. Risk characteristics included: atypical mole syndrome (AMS), personal and family history of melanoma, personal history of ≥2 melanomas, confirmed gene mutation of CDKN2A or CDK4 or other cancer risk conditions. DFU was performed by an expert dermatoscopist with FotoFinder® . This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Keywords: risk; step method; method digital; high risk; digital follow; two step

Journal Title: British Journal of Dermatology
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.