LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

The challenge with systematic reviews of non‐randomised studies in urology

Photo from academic.microsoft.com

I n this issue, BJU International has made the conscious decision to publish a systematic review (SR) and metaanalysis (MA) by Guo et al. [1] to inform the question of… Click to show full abstract

I n this issue, BJU International has made the conscious decision to publish a systematic review (SR) and metaanalysis (MA) by Guo et al. [1] to inform the question of whether patients undergoing nephrouretectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma are at increased risk of worse oncological outcomes. This question was also the topic of a similar review by Marchioni et al. [2] published earlier this year in this journal. Both studies were submitted around the same time and underwent independent, parallel peer review that resulted in different editorial decisions. Given their similarity in methodological quality they both deserved similar consideration for publication, which the journal is hereby honouring.

Keywords: reviews non; challenge systematic; randomised studies; systematic reviews; urology; non randomised

Journal Title: BJU International
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.