LAUSR

Cardiovascular disease affects a significant proportion of the population with global prevalence of 6,081 per 100,000 (Virani et al., 2020). Most core risk factors are well characterised and can be controlled with interventions, also meaning it is possible to identify most people at increased risk of acute events, defined as a 10-year risk of events of >20%. However, the real-world occurrence of events in this at-risk population is relatively low suggesting there is still much to be learnt or identified in spotting the vulnerable patient harbouring vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque at the earliest possible time. The development of atherosclerotic plaque spans people's lifetime. The risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) can be estimated as a roughly equal balance of genetically inherited susceptibility and exposure to environmental risk factors. Increasingly, the complexity of coronary artery disease (CAD), as the archetypal CVD, is underlined by the fact that a large number of genes or gene sets comprising up to 14% of genes in the genome can be linked to functionally influencing CAD development (Nikpay et al., 2020), through the association of genetic variants with CAD risk in large international cohorts. The majority of these variants play a small role (e.g. 2–5% effect size) (Howson et al., 2017) and so, which novel gene products to target therapeutically remains a question that must be answered with future studies. Atherosclerosis is almost universally present and is a longstanding pathology. Fundamentally, plaque develops as a result of a maladaptive response of the artery wall and infiltrating immune cells to accumulation and modification of lipoprotein, such as low density lipoprotein (LDL) and lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) (Lichtman et al., 2013). Well-characterised risk factors, in addition to the circulating LDL level, are blood pressure, systemic inflammation, diabetes and obesity (Yusuf et al., 2004). Thus, the concept of vulnerable patients can be described as patients presenting with a combination of multiple risk factors and/or extremely high risk levels of one of these core risks (Naghavi et al., 2003). All these risk factors feed into the core interaction between LDL, vascular cells responding to the injurious accumulation and oxidative modification of LDL trapped in the subendothelial space, along with the invasion of myeloid cells and T cells that can either promote progression or resolution of plaque inflammation (reviewed in Tabas & Lichtman, 2017). In the last 30 years, there has been a growing recognition that some specific characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques, which make the plaque more prone to trigger thrombotic events, are far more important clinically than absolute size or level of lumen occlusion (Finn et al., 2010). For example, the majority of events in the SCOT-HEART study were not triggered by the presence of occlusive disease (Investigators et al., 2018). Thus, the concept of vulnerable plaques is the focus of endeavours in the field. This review series focuses on advances critical to the identification, mechanistic understanding and treatment of vulnerable patients, and the vulnerable plaques that trigger adverse events. These articles were commissioned leading on from a British Atherosclerosis Society meeting entitled “From the vulnerable plaque to the vulnerable patient.” Vulnerable plaques are not all the same. Thin-cap fibroatheroma, defined as a fibrous cap and evidence of macrophage infiltration, is prone to rupture. Another form of advanced plaque is rather prone to erosion. The increased use of statins has led to a shift from thin-cap fibroatheroma to plaque erosions over time (Libby & Pasterkamp, 2015). Originally defined by histology, defining vulnerable plaques in at-risk (vulnerable) patients is now possible using a raft of imaging techniques including PET, CT, MRI and intravascular ultrasound. Characterising a patient's actual arteries is a powerful tool essential in formally quantifying the burden of disease. Now multiple modalities are available in the research setting and increasingly in routine clinical practice. Two complementary reviews from Sriranjan et al. (Sriranjan et al., 2021) and Daghem and Newby (Daghem & Newby, 2021) review the use PET and CT in assessing vulnerable patients and defining vulnerable plaques. PET utilises radiotracers binding molecular targets to gain a detailed characterisation of body tissues non-invasively. It has most extensively been used in oncology but with the development of instrumentation and availability of novel radiolabelled probes is now used in other areas including, prominently, in CVD patients. PET enables labelling of, for example, glucose incorporation and the presence of macrophages. In their review, Sriranjan et al. (2021) discuss the advances in PET usage for assessing vulnerable plaques and the results of trials using PET imaging. Fluorodeoxy-glucose has been used both in prognostic investigations and in interventional trials, particularly in those aiming to target inflammation directly. The range of Abbreviations: CAD, coronary artery disease; CT, computed tomography; CVD, cardiovascular disease; VSMC, vascular smooth muscle cell. DOI: 10.1111/bph.15347