BACKGROUND Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) improve sensitivity of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) detection compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA), but their ability to predict clinical events… Click to show full abstract
BACKGROUND Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) improve sensitivity of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) detection compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA), but their ability to predict clinical events is unknown. We determined whether severe CAV detected with ICA, IVUS or OCT correlates with graft function. METHODS Comparison of specific vessel parameters between IVUS and OCT on 20 patients attending for angiography 12-24 months post-orthotopic heart transplant. Serial left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was recorded prospectively. RESULTS Analyzing 55 coronary arteries, OCT and IVUS correlated well for vessel CAV characteristics. A mean intimal thickness (MIT)OCT >0.25mm had a sensitivity of 86.7% and specificity of 74.3% at detecting Stanford grade 4 CAV. Those with angiographically-evident CAV had significant reduction in graft EF over 7.3 years follow-up (median ΔEF -2% vs +1.5%, p = 0.03). Patients with MITOCT >0.25mm in at least one vessel had a lower median EF at time of surveillance (57% vs 62%, p = 0.014). Two MACEs were noted. CONCLUSION Imaging with OCT correlates well with IVUS for CAV detection. Combined angiography and OCT to screen for CAV within 12-24 months of transplant predicts concurrent and future deterioration in graft function. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.