LAUSR

The word ‘disability’ does not exist in most African languages. There are words for impairments that describe the ‘missing’ or affected body parts, but no specific words to characterize, for instance, neurodevelopmental conditions. In this narrative review we focus on the different interpretations of neurodevelopmental conditions in Uganda and discuss the importance of cultural concepts and the intersectionality of family‐centred care, poverty, and neocolonialism when working with children with ‘impairments of the brain’. We suggest that these concepts should be taken into consideration in health care service provision and public health awareness campaigns, and the need to rethink how disabled children can be included in a ‘global’ health approach. We explain how applying biomedical categories used in the Global North to diagnose children is only ethical if this information will benefit the child and is accompanied by supportive actions that are relevant to the child and family setting. We argue for the enhancement of community‐based structures of belonging and interdependence that are already in place and strengthening of family and community networks to continue the care and co‐responsibility for children with ‘impairments of the brain’.