The prevalence of Type 2 diabetes mellitus is rising exponentially across the globe [1], mainly as a result of changes in lifestyle [2]. Other factors accounting for this rise include… Click to show full abstract
The prevalence of Type 2 diabetes mellitus is rising exponentially across the globe [1], mainly as a result of changes in lifestyle [2]. Other factors accounting for this rise include proactive screening, people with diabetes living longer and an ageing general population [3]. With the increasing age comes an increase in the prevalence of chronic diseases and multimorbidity [4]. People with diabetes not only develop complications directly related to the condition, but also often have multimorbidities in addition to their diabetes [4]. Despite the challenges the rising prevalence presents, there have been some improvements in mortality rates [5], partly as a result of the increased use of statins, antihypertensive therapies and an increase in smoking cessation rates [6]. Current strategies for managing diabetes focus on encouraging clinicians and people with diabetes to adopt evidencebased, often single-strategy, interventions; however, far more complex strategies are often needed. For these complex and multiple interventions to be effective, various diabetes care models have been proposed, and include multidisciplinary teams and multifaceted interventions [7] to deal with the complexity of demand created by diabetes and its comorbid conditions. The chronic care model, an example of such an integrated model of care, focuses on effective integration of care around the individual patient [8]. This integration of care normally comprises specialists, sometimes working in community diabetes clinics, with the support of generalists with special interest in diabetes, specialist nurses, dieticians and podiatrists. Yet a recent cluster randomized controlled trial examining the impact of integrated diabetes clinics highlighted the fact that these have little effect on intermediate outcomes but are associated with higher costs to the health services [9]. There is therefore an urgent need for healthcare providers and policy-makers to generate evidence on high-quality cost-effective alternatives that can achieve better patient outcomes, while maintaining continuity. In many developed countries, primary care physicians, family physicians or generalist clinicians maintain a registered patient list and have a continuous knowledge and relationship with the individuals with diabetes. As a result of the knowledge of the bio-psychosocial histories of people living with diabetes, the generalist is suitably equipped to exercise professional judgment in their management of the people with diabetes and other multimorbid conditions beyond the guidelines. They bring their own personal knowledge of the patient to the decision-making process, integrating this with research evidence to make informed judgments. As well as these advantages, patients may also benefit by having their care provided close to their home. Healthcare systems as a whole could potentially therefore benefit because primary care-based care is likely to be more cost-effective [10]. Emergency admissions resulting from diabetes or its complications are an unexpected health event and it is this complex group that should ideally be managed in specialist units. Of all the people with diabetes admitted in 2015 in England and Wales, only 9% were admitted specifically because of their diabetes condition [11]. Thus, more specialist care is neither a good solution nor an alternative for the inadequate management of the vast majority of people with diabetes. Good quality service evaluations are lacking, but emerging data on structured diabetes service redesign, involving enhanced diabetes-skilled primary care physicians, nurses and healthcare assistants in the primary care settings have shown these models to be at least as effective in reducing hospitalizations, outpatient attendance or admissions for diabetes-related complications compared with an integrated specialist–community care core diabetes service [12]. In this evaluation the primary care enhancement initially consisted of upskilling the generalist in the up-to-date management of diabetes. The key to the success of these models includes primary care physicians with an interest in diabetes undertaking enhanced skills training. A practice nurse with similar or equivalent diabetes qualifications supporting the primary care physician is also important. The model of care needs to Correspondence to: Samuel Seidu. E-mail: [email protected]
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.