LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Toward fulfilling the aspirational goal of science as self‐correcting: A call for editorial courage and diligence for error correction

Photo by drew_hays from unsplash

The Self-Correction Norm. Science is often described as 'self-correcting'. Correction of scientific errors is vital, but it does not occur spontaneously. Rather, correction depends on individual scientists behaving in accordance… Click to show full abstract

The Self-Correction Norm. Science is often described as 'self-correcting'. Correction of scientific errors is vital, but it does not occur spontaneously. Rather, correction depends on individual scientists behaving in accordance with the self-correction norm (1). Some authors have suggested that failure to correct certain errors be considered scientific misconduct (2). But when serious errors are found, our experience suggests that corrections are not always expeditious, thorough, clear, and open. Herein, we address journals' distinctive roles in correcting peer-reviewed scientific literature. The scientific community needs key individuals, including journal editors, to facilitate the correction process and to adjudicate disagreements in the field.

Keywords: toward fulfilling; science; fulfilling aspirational; correction; self; self correcting

Journal Title: European Journal of Clinical Investigation
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.