LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

The efficacy and safety of DOACs versus LMWH for cancer-associated thrombosis: A systematic review & meta-analysis.

Photo from wikipedia

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains the second most common cause of death in cancer patients.1 Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have revolutionized treatment of VTE, though cancer patients were underrepresented in early… Click to show full abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains the second most common cause of death in cancer patients.1 Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have revolutionized treatment of VTE, though cancer patients were underrepresented in early trials.2-4 Low-molecular weight heparins (LMWH) have been the gold-standard for treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT)5,6 until publication of several randomized controlled trials (RCT) exploring DOACs for CAT.7,8 In 2019, two systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluated two RCTs7,8 and showed a trend toward reduced VTE recurrence and increased major bleeding with DOACs compared with LMWH.9,10 We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of DOACs for CAT.

Keywords: review meta; systematic review; cancer; cancer associated; associated thrombosis; doacs

Journal Title: European journal of haematology
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.