LAUSR

Performance validity tests (PVTs) are used in neuropsychological assessments to detect patterns of performance suggesting that the broader evaluation may be an invalid reflection of an individual's abilities. Data on functional motor disorder (FMD) are currently poor and conflicting. We aimed to examine the rate of failure on three different PVTs of nonlitigant, non‐compensation‐seeking FMD patients, and we compared their performance to that of healthy controls and controls asked to simulate malingering (healthy simulators).