Segmental eight‐point bioimpedance has been increasingly used in practice. However, whether changes in bioimpedance analysis components before and after hemodialysis (HD) using this technique in a standing position is comparable… Click to show full abstract
Segmental eight‐point bioimpedance has been increasingly used in practice. However, whether changes in bioimpedance analysis components before and after hemodialysis (HD) using this technique in a standing position is comparable to traditional whole‐body wrist‐to‐ankle method is still unclear. We aimed to investigate the differences between two eight‐point devices (InBody 770 and Seca mBCA 514) and one wrist‐to‐ankle (Hydra 4200) in HD patients and healthy subjects in a standing position.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.