LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Semantics of the insect decline narrative: recommendations for communicating insect conservation to peer and public audiences

Photo by john_cameron from unsplash

Ambiguous or misleading language can affect science communication with peer and public audiences, with potentially damaging impacts on policy and public engagement. The word decline can be value‐laden and has… Click to show full abstract

Ambiguous or misleading language can affect science communication with peer and public audiences, with potentially damaging impacts on policy and public engagement. The word decline can be value‐laden and has inherent negative connotations. It is not always the most appropriate term to use for effective science communication to promote insect biodiversity and conservation issues. We recommend four key questions to consider when deciding whether the term insect decline is appropriate to use. Evidence‐based insect conservation depends on public and political support. Moving forward, researchers and communicators should be mindful that the inherent diversity of insects demands a nuanced and diverse scientific discussion, not an ambiguous and generalised one.

Keywords: peer public; public audiences; conservation; insect decline; insect conservation; semantics

Journal Title: Insect Conservation and Diversity
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.