LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

A 20‐year historical prospective cohort study of root canal treatments. A Multilevel analysis

Photo by dawson2406 from unsplash

AIM To evaluate the number of healthy and functional root filled teeth of patients included in a recall programme for at least 20 years. METHODOLOGY Teeth were root filled by a… Click to show full abstract

AIM To evaluate the number of healthy and functional root filled teeth of patients included in a recall programme for at least 20 years. METHODOLOGY Teeth were root filled by a single specialist following manual canal instrumentation, lateral/vertical compaction of gutta-percha and restored with glass-ionomer cements and bonding system/composite resin. In a large percentage of teeth, a metal-ceramic crown was placed during follow-up. Patients included in the recall programme (n = 130) were blindly assessed both clinically and radiographically (every 2 years) to evaluate clinical symptoms and periapical status (PAI). The following variables were analysed: age, tooth location, tooth type, initial diagnosis, PAI, root filling length and coronal restoration type. Chi-square test and multilevel analysis were performed to detect variables associated with treatment functionality and disease/lesions (P < 0.05). A cumulative teeth survival curve was constructed by means of Kaplan-Meier using extractions as the end-point. RESULTS At the 20-year recall, 72 patients (31 M, 41 F; mean age 57.7 ± 8.29 years; 196 teeth) completed the follow-up. Thirty-six patients were excluded for medical complications or died before the end of the study. Drop-outs consisted of 22 patients (17%) who did not complete the follow-up. Single metal-ceramic crowns were positioned after 4-6 months in 40% of teeth. Composite restorations were replaced with single metal-ceramic crowns during the follow-up in 53% of teeth after 8-19 years. Of 196 teeth, 155 were classified as Survived (79%), 128 of which (65%) were Healthy (PAI ≤ 2). Thirty-nine teeth (20%) were extracted for nonendodontic reasons. Twenty-nine teeth (15%) were classified as: re-exacerbation (11 teeth; 5.6%) or persistent asymptomatic lesions (18 teeth; 9%). Only two re-exacerbated teeth were extracted. Multilevel analysis confirmed the clinical relevance of tooth type (P = 0.001) on Survived and healthy teeth (P = 0.007). Tooth location (P = 0.0045) and initial diagnosis (P = 0.019) significantly affected only Healthy teeth. CONCLUSIONS Root filled teeth were more frequently extracted for non-endodontic reasons rather than for endodontic disease. The majority of teeth with adequate root fillings, adequate restorations and included in a recall programme remained functional and healthy for more than 20 years.

Keywords: multilevel analysis; analysis; year; study; root filled

Journal Title: International Endodontic Journal
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.