AIM To synthesize qualitative evidence of premenopausal women's experiences of fertility decision-making with a diagnosis of breast cancer. BACKGROUND Breast cancer is increasingly more common in premenopausal women who may… Click to show full abstract
AIM To synthesize qualitative evidence of premenopausal women's experiences of fertility decision-making with a diagnosis of breast cancer. BACKGROUND Breast cancer is increasingly more common in premenopausal women who may have not yet considered starting a family or have completed their families. DESIGN Qualitative evidence synthesis guided by Thomas and Harden's three-stage approach to thematic analysis. DATA SOURCES Twelve electronic databases were searched: CINAHL, Embase, Pubmed, Proquest, PsychINFO, Lenus, Scopus, Web of Science, Rian.ie, Medline, EThOS e-theses online and DART Europe. No year limit was set. REVIEW METHODS The 'Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research guidelines' (ENTREQ) statement was followed. RESULTS Fifteen qualitative studies were included in the synthesis. Seven review findings under four major themes were identified: (1) first comes survival, (2) making decisions 'under the gun', (3) health-care professionals should not make assumptions and (4) we want accurate, detailed information and we want it early. High confidence in six of the review findings was agreed. CONCLUSION Most women experienced rushed fertility preservation decision-making at a time when they also faced cancer treatment decisions. Women want detailed, clear information on fertility preservation early after their diagnosis.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.