LAUSR

2020;48:263–70. 3 Carlier M, Baboudjian M, Govidin L, Yahia M, Chiappini J, Lechevallier E, et al. Single-use versus reusable flexible ureteroscope: technical and medicoeconomic aspects. Prog Urol. 2021;31:937–42. 4 Ellenbogen PH, Scheible FW, Talner LB, Leopold GR. Sensitivity of gray scale ultrasound in detecting urinary tract obstruction. Am J Roentgenol. 1978;130:731–3. 5 Elbahnasy AM, Clayman RV, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM, Chandhoke P, Lingeman JE, et al. Lower pole calyceal stone clearance after SWL, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and flexible URS; impact of radiographic spatial anatomy. J Endourol. 1998;12:113–9. 6 Tuckey J, Devasia A, Murthy L, Ramsden P, Thomas D. Is there a simple method for predicting lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy than measuring infundibulopelvic angle? J Endourol. 2000;14:475–8. 7 Inoue T, Murota T, Okada S, Hamamoto S, Muguruma K, Kinoshita H, et al. Influence of pelvicaliceal anatomy on stone clearance after flexible ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for large renal stones. J Endourol. 2015;29:998–1005. 8 Sampaio FJ, Aragao AH. Inferior pole collecting system anatomy; its probable role in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 1992;147:322–4. 9 Sampaio FJ, D’Anunciac ~ao AL, Silva EC. Comparative follow-up of patients with acute and obtuse infundibulum-pelvic angle submitted to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower calyceal stones; preliminary report and proposed study design. J Endourol. 1997;11:157–61. 10 Hiller SC, Ghani KR. Frontiers of stone management. Curr Opin Urol. 2020;30:17–23. 11 Resorlu B, Oguz U, Resorlu EB, Oztuna D, Unsal A. The impact of pelvicaliceal anatomy on the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with lower pole renal stones. Urology. 2012;79:61–6. 12 Jessen JP, Honeck P, Knoll T, Wendt-Nordahl G. Flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones: influence of the collecting system’s anatomy. J Endourol. 2014;28:146–51. 13 Dresner SL, Iremashvili V, Best SL, Hedican SP, Nakada SY. Influence of lower pole infundibulopelvic angle on success of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for the treatment of renal stones. J Endourol. 2020;34:655–60. 14 Ozimek T, Cordes J, Wiessmeyer JR, Schneider MH, Hupe MC, Gilbert N, et al. Steep infundibulopelvic angle as a new risk factor for flexible ureteroscope damage and complicated postoperative course. J Endourol. 2018;32:597–602. 15 Ozimek T, Hochguertel L, Hupe MC, Struck JP, Wiessmeyer JR, Gilbert N, et al. Risk factors for a complicated postoperative course in flexible ureteroscopy. Urol Int. 2021;105:611–8. 16 Dragos LB, Somani BK, Sener ET, Buttice S, Proietti S, Ploumidis A, et al. Which flexible ureteroscopes (digital ve. Fiber-optic) can easily reach the difficult lower pole calices and have better end-tip deflection; in vitro study on K-box. A PETRA evaluation. J Endourol. 2017;31:630–7. 17 Jung GH, Jung JH, Ahn TS, Lee JS, Cho SY, Jeong CW, et al. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus a single-session percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole stones with a diameter of 15 to 30 mm: a propensity score-matching study. Korean J Urol. 2015;56(7):525–32. 18 El-Shazly M, Aziz M, Omar M, Al-Hunaidi O, El-Nahas AR. Management of anterior caliceal stones >15 mm. Urolithiasis. 2016;44(4):377–81.