LAUSR

INTRODUCTION To measure patients' evaluation of telehealth, preferences for telehealth versus in-person appointments, and potential cost savings by patient characteristics. METHODS A cross-sectional online survey (including patient and appointment characteristics, telehealth evaluation, preferences for care and costs) of adult patients using video telehealth in four metropolitan tertiary hospital services in Melbourne, Victoria. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS A total of 1045 patients (44 years - IQR 29-59) participated with an overall response rate of 9.2%. For 98.7% patients telehealth was convenient, 96.4% stated that it saved time, 95.9% found telehealth acceptable to receive care and 97.0% found that telehealth improved their access to care. Most (62.6%) preferred in-person consultations, although 86.9% agreed that telehealth was equivalent to an in-person consultation. Those in regional and rural areas were less likely to prefer in-person consultations. Patients attending for medical reasons were less likely to prefer in-person consultation compared to patients with surgical reasons. Patient preference to telehealth were independent of level of education, appointment type, self-rated health status and socio-economic status. Patients saved an average of $120.9 (SD $93.0) per appointment, with greater cost savings for patients from low and middle socioeconomic areas and regional or rural areas. Telehealth video consultations were largely evaluated positively with most patients considering the service to be as good as in-person. Understanding patient preference is critical to consider when implementing telehealth as mainstream across hospital health services. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.