LAUSR

AIM To evaluate the clinical efficacy of full-mouth scaling (FMS), full-mouth disinfection (FMD) and FMD with adjuvant erythritol air-polishing (FMDAP) compared to quadrant-wise debridement (Q-SRP) in patients with periodontitis stage III/IV. METHODS In this four-arm parallel prospective, randomized controlled multi-center study changes of pocket probing depths (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding on probing (BOP) and proportion of closed pockets (PPD≤4 mm without BOP) were evaluated at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. RESULTS From 190 randomly participating patients, 172 were included in the final analysis. All groups resulted in significant (p<0.05) improvements of all clinical parameters over 3 and 6 months. During the study period, FMDAP showed significantly higher reductions of mean PPD in teeth with moderate (PPD 4-6 mm) and deep (PPD>6mm) pockets and significantly increased proportions of pocket closure than Q-SRP. Patients treated with FMD had significantly greater PPD reduction in deep pockets and a higher percentage of pocket closure after 3, but not after 6 months compared to Q-SRP. CAL and BOP changes did not significantly differ among all groups. Efficiency of treatment (time effort to gain one closed pocket) was significantly higher for FMDAP, FMD and FMS compared to Q-SRP (6.3, 8.5, 9.5 versus 17.8 min per closed pocket; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS All treatment groups were effective, without significant differences between full-mouth approaches. FMDAP improved clinical outcomes over Q-SRP for moderate and deep pockets after 6 months. Full-mouth protocols were more time-efficient than conventional Q-SRP.