LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Association of lymph node metastases, grade and extent of mesenteric lymph node dissection in locoregional small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors with recurrence‐free survival

Photo by cdx2 from unsplash

We aimed to assess the prognostic impact of tumor‐ and patient‐related parameters in patients with stage I–III small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI‐NETs), who underwent locoregional resective surgery (LRS) with curative… Click to show full abstract

We aimed to assess the prognostic impact of tumor‐ and patient‐related parameters in patients with stage I–III small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI‐NETs), who underwent locoregional resective surgery (LRS) with curative intent. We included 229 patients with stage I–III SI‐NETs diagnosed from June 15, 1993, through March 8, 2021, identified using the SI‐NET databases from five European referral centers. Mean ± SD age at baseline was 62.5 ± 13.6 years; 111/229 patients were women (49.3%). All tumors were well‐differentiated; 160 were grade 1 (G1) tumors, 51 were G2, two were G3 and 18 tumors were of unspecified grade (median Ki‐67: 2%, range 1%–50%). One‐hundred and sixty‐three patients (71.2%) had lymph node (LN) involvement. The median number of retrieved lymph nodes was 10 (0–63), whereas the median number of positive LNs was 2 (0–43). After a mean ± SD follow‐up of 54.1 ± 64.1 months, 60 patients experienced disease recurrence at a median (range) of 36.2 (2.5–285.1) months. The 5‐ and 10‐year recurrence‐free survival (RFS) rates were 66.6% and 49.3% respectively. In univariable analysis, there was no difference in RFS and overall survival (OS) between LN‐positive and LN‐negative patients (log‐rank, p = .380 and .198, respectively). However, in stage IIIb patients who underwent mesenteric lymph node dissection (MLND) with a minimum of five retrieved LN (n = 125), five or more LN metastases were associated with shorter RFS (median RFS [95% CI] = 107.4 [0–229.6] vs. 73.7 [35.3–112.1] months; log‐rank, p = .048). In addition, patients with G2 tumors exhibited shorter RFS compared to patients with G1 tumors (median RFS [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 46.9 [36.4–57.3] vs. 120.7 [82.7–158.8] months; log‐rank, p = .001). In multivariable Cox‐regression RFS analysis in stage IIIb patients, the Ki‐67 proliferation index (hazard ratio = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.035–1.131; p < .0001) and the number of LN metastases (hazard ratio = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.001–1.125; p = .047) were independent prognostic factors for RFS. In conclusion, LRS with a meticulous MLND and a minimum number of five harvested LNs appears to be critical in the surgical management of SI‐NET patients with locoregional disease. In patients who underwent LRS and MLND, the Ki‐67 proliferation index and the LN metastases count were independent predictors of RFS.

Keywords: rfs; neuroendocrine tumors; lymph node; small intestinal; intestinal neuroendocrine

Journal Title: Journal of Neuroendocrinology
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.