LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Mentors' self-assessed competence in mentoring nursing students in clinical practice: A systematic review of quantitative studies.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To examine registered nurses' self-evaluation of their competence in mentoring nursing students in clinical practice. BACKGROUND Clinical mentors have significant roles and responsibility for nursing students' clinical… Click to show full abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To examine registered nurses' self-evaluation of their competence in mentoring nursing students in clinical practice. BACKGROUND Clinical mentors have significant roles and responsibility for nursing students' clinical learning. Moreover, the mentors' role is becoming increasingly important internationally, as the role of nurse teachers in mentoring students in clinical practice has declined. However, in most EU countries there are no specific educational requirements for clinical mentors, although they need targeted education to increase their competence in mentoring nursing students. DESIGN The systematic review of quantitative studies was designed according to guidelines of the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and PRISMA protocol. METHODS Studies published during 2000-2019 that met inclusion criteria formulated in PiCOS format were systematically reviewed by three independent reviewers. CINAHL (Ebsco), PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, ERIC, and Medic databases were used to retrieve the studies. Three independent reviewers conducted the systematic review process. The studies were tabulated, thematically compared and narratively reported. RESULTS In total, 16 peer-reviewed studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies identified various dimensions of mentors“ competence and associated environmental factors. Generally, participating mentors rated competences related to the clinical environment, mentoring, supporting students' learning processes and relevant personal characteristics fairly high. They also rated organizational practices in their workplaces, resources in the clinical environment and their mentor-student and mentor-stakeholder pedagogical practices, as respectable or satisfactory. CONCLUSION The results indicate considerable scope for improving mentors' competence, particularly through enhancing organizational mentoring practices and relevant resources in clinical environments. RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE Pedagogical practices of mentors in relations with both students and stakeholders should be enhanced to improve future nurses' learning. This systematic review addresses a gap in knowledge of mentors' self-evaluated competence that could assist the formulation of effective educational programs for mentors internationally and improving clinical environments.

Keywords: competence; nursing students; clinical practice; systematic review; students clinical

Journal Title: Journal of clinical nursing
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.