LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Writing for publication- implications of text recycling and cut and paste writing.

Photo by markusspiske from unsplash

Increased use and availability of electronic text matching software (such as ithenticateTM ) to screen submissions to peer reviewed journals, means that Editors are increasingly being made aware of potential… Click to show full abstract

Increased use and availability of electronic text matching software (such as ithenticateTM ) to screen submissions to peer reviewed journals, means that Editors are increasingly being made aware of potential cases of plagiarism (Debnath 2016). While there are no true figures for academic plagiarism within submissions to peer-reviewed journals (Gasparyan et al 2017), anecdotally upwards of 25% of all submissions require some level of follow up and investigation. The text matching details provided by software such as ithenticateTM supports Editor decision-making, and assists Editors to explore all incidences of text matching fully.

Keywords: text matching; text recycling; publication implications; recycling cut; implications text; writing publication

Journal Title: Journal of nursing management
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.