LAUSR

AIM This study was conducted to evaluate clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and healthcare resource use (HCRU) for patients in Japan with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) and anaemia. METHODS This retrospective, longitudinal, epidemiological database extraction study used the JMDC Claims Database, comprising ~9.4 million unique beneficiaries. The observation period for anaemia and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)/iron treatment was 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2018, and for HCRU and costs was 1 April 2016 to 31 March 2018. The non-dialysis-dependent CKD anaemia population, and the ESA treatment, iron treatment, and no-treatment cohorts were evaluated. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes were summarised descriptively. RESULTS The non-dialysis-dependent CKD anaemia population included 5908 patients (7.9%), with 464 patients in the ESA treatment cohort, 809 patients (13.7%) in the iron treatment cohort (13.7%), and 4405 (74.6%) patients in the no-treatment cohort. The prevalence of patients prescribed an antihypertensive, antidiabetic, and/or antihyperlipidaemic medication generally increased with increasing baseline CKD stage. Proportions of no treatment for anaemia decreased while ESA treatment increased with increasing CKD stage; ESA treatment increased with decreasing baseline haemoglobin levels. Patients in the ESA treatment cohort generally had more frequent events associated with HCRU and higher costs from HCRU-associated activities (e.g., inpatient and outpatient care, pharmacy). CONCLUSION As CKD severity increased, anaemia management changed from iron use or no treatment to ESA use; however, anaemia may be undertreated across all CKD stages. ESA-treated patients incurred greater HCRU-associated costs relative to other patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD anaemia in Japan.