LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Comparison of flow‐FISH and MM–qPCR telomere length assessment techniques for the screening of telomeropathies

Photo by tangzhengtao from unsplash

Assessment of telomere length (TL) in peripheral blood leukocytes is part of the diagnostic algorithm applied to patients with acquired bone marrow failure syndromes (BMFSs) and dyskeratosis congenita (DKC). Monochrome… Click to show full abstract

Assessment of telomere length (TL) in peripheral blood leukocytes is part of the diagnostic algorithm applied to patients with acquired bone marrow failure syndromes (BMFSs) and dyskeratosis congenita (DKC). Monochrome multiplex–quantitative polymerase chain reaction (MM–qPCR) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (flow‐FISH) are methodologies available for TL screening. Dependent on TL expressed in relation to percentiles of healthy controls, further genetic testing for inherited mutations in telomere maintenance genes is recommended. However, the correct threshold to trigger this genetic workup is still under debate. Here, we prospectively compared MM–qPCR and flow‐FISH regarding their capacity for accurate identification of DKC patients. All patients (n = 105) underwent genetic testing by next‐generation sequencing and in 16 patients, mutations in DKC‐relevant genes were identified. Whole leukocyte TL of patients measured by MM–qPCR was found to be moderately correlated with lymphocyte TL measured by flow‐FISH (r² = 0.34; P < 0.0001). The sensitivity of both methods was high, but the specificity of MM–qPCR (29%) was significantly lower compared with flow‐FISH (58%). These results suggest that MM–qPCR of peripheral blood cells is inferior to flow‐FISH for clinical routine screening for suspected DKC in adult patients with BMFS due to lower specificity and a higher rate of false‐positive results.

Keywords: qpcr; telomere length; flow fish; comparison flow; assessment; fish

Journal Title: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.