LAUSR

Several technical limitations of Luminex single antigen (LSA) assays have been described so far. This study focused on a reactivity pattern observed in many sera that cannot be explained by eplets described in the Epitope Registry database and sometimes appearing against a self-HLA allele or antigen. In most cases, this pattern is revealed by a discrepant result when compared with other assays (Luminex PRA, cell-binding assays such as flow cytometry cross match, LSA from another manufacturer…). We focus here on the Cw1/12/15 pattern appearing on the LABScreen class I LSA provided by One Lambda. We documented its behavior using this LSA after acid denaturation of the beads, using Lifecodes LSA from Immucor, and adsorption of sera either on spleen mononuclear cells from deceased donors or on single HLA transfected cell clones. We studied 33 sera from different patients positive for the three Cw beads, selected from our routine patients' LSA database. Nine patients had transplants from a Cw12 or Cw15 donor without any pejorative evolution of the graft, nor post-transplant MFI (mean fluorescence intensity) increase of the Cw1/12/15 beads. A significant increase of MFI was observed after acid denaturation of the LABScreen beads. All sera tested by Lifecodes LSA were negative for these Cw beads. Finally, we found no significant difference of MFI after adsorption on cells from either origin. Therefore, the Cw1/12/15 pattern appears to be a false positive reactivity of the LABScreen single antigen assay.