LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Validation of the Moody and Henry–Fauske Critical Flow Models in apros Against Marviken Critical Flow Experiments

Photo by darthxuan from unsplash

The Moody and Henry–Fauske critical flow models implemented in Advanced Process Simulation Software (apros) have been validated against Marviken critical flow experiments and compared with other available simulations of the… Click to show full abstract

The Moody and Henry–Fauske critical flow models implemented in Advanced Process Simulation Software (apros) have been validated against Marviken critical flow experiments and compared with other available simulations of the same experiments. Both models in combination with discharge coefficient 0.75 (suggested for best estimate calculations) produce results close to the experimental data for two-phase flows, while one-phase flow of subcooled water is underpredicted. Using discharge coefficient 1.0 for subcooled water leads to a good match with the experimental results, while two-phase flows become overpredicted.

Keywords: fauske critical; flow models; moody henry; critical flow; henry fauske; flow

Journal Title: Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.