LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Variations of image interpretations of radiologists from different populations in mammography and tomosynthesis with different levels of breast density

Photo from wikipedia

Abstract. Purpose This study aims to investigate the diagnostic performances of Australian and Shanghai-based Chinese radiologists in reading full-field digital mammogram (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with different levels… Click to show full abstract

Abstract. Purpose This study aims to investigate the diagnostic performances of Australian and Shanghai-based Chinese radiologists in reading full-field digital mammogram (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with different levels of breast density. Approach Eighty-two Australian radiologists interpreted a 60-case FFDM set, and 29 radiologists also reported a 35-case DBT set. Sixty Shanghai radiologists read the same FFDM set, and 32 radiologists read the DBT set. The diagnostic performances of Australian and Shanghai radiologists were assessed using truth data (cancer cases were biopsy proven) and compared overall in specificity, case sensitivity, lesion sensitivity, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) area under the curve, and jack-knife free-response receiver operating characteristics (JAFROC) figure of merit, and they were stratified by case characteristics using the Mann–Whitney U test. The Spearman rank test was used to explore the association between radiologists’ performances and their work experience in mammogram interpretation. Results There were significantly higher performances of Australian radiologists compared with Shanghai radiologists in low breast density for case sensitivity, lesion sensitivity, ROC, and JAFROC in the FFDM set (P  <  0.0001); in high breast density, Shanghai radiologists’ performances in lesion sensitivity and JAFROC were also lower than Australian radiologists (P  <  0.0001). In the DBT test set, Australian radiologists performed better than Shanghai radiologists in cancer detection in both low and high breast density. The work experience of Australian radiologists was positively linked to their diagnostic performances, whereas this association was not statistically significant in Shanghai radiologists. Conclusion There were significant variations in reading performances between Australian and Shanghai radiologists in FFDM and DBT across different levels of breast density, lesion types, and lesion sizes. An effective training initiative tailored to suit local readers is essential to enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of Shanghai radiologists.

Keywords: shanghai radiologists; different levels; levels breast; breast density

Journal Title: Journal of Medical Imaging
Year Published: 2023

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.