LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Machine learning in detecting frequency-following responses

To improve the efficiency and timeliness in frequency-following response (FFR) testing, the purpose of this study was to investigate the capabilities of machine learning in the detection of an FFR.… Click to show full abstract

To improve the efficiency and timeliness in frequency-following response (FFR) testing, the purpose of this study was to investigate the capabilities of machine learning in the detection of an FFR. Continuous brain waves were recorded from 25 Chinese adults in response to a pre-recorded Mandarin monosyllable \yi2\ with a rising frequency contour. A total of 8000 artifact-free sweeps were recorded from each participant. Continuous brain waves accumulated (from the first sweep) up to the first 500 sweeps were considered FFR absent; brain waves accumulated (from the first sweep) up to the last 1000 sweeps (i.e., from 7001 to 8000 sweeps) were considered FFR present. Six response features (frequency error, slope error, tracking accuracy, spectral amplitude, pitch strength, and root-mean-square amplitude) were extracted from each recording and served as key predictors in the identification of a response. Twenty-three supervised machine-learning algorithms, with a 10-fold cross-validation procedure, were implemented via a Classification Learner App in MATLAB. Two algorithms yielded 100% efficiency (i.e., 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity) and 14 others produced efficiency ≥99%. Results indicated that a majority of the machine-learning algorithms provided efficient and accurate predictions in whether an FFR was present or absent in a recording.To improve the efficiency and timeliness in frequency-following response (FFR) testing, the purpose of this study was to investigate the capabilities of machine learning in the detection of an FFR. Continuous brain waves were recorded from 25 Chinese adults in response to a pre-recorded Mandarin monosyllable \yi2\ with a rising frequency contour. A total of 8000 artifact-free sweeps were recorded from each participant. Continuous brain waves accumulated (from the first sweep) up to the first 500 sweeps were considered FFR absent; brain waves accumulated (from the first sweep) up to the last 1000 sweeps (i.e., from 7001 to 8000 sweeps) were considered FFR present. Six response features (frequency error, slope error, tracking accuracy, spectral amplitude, pitch strength, and root-mean-square amplitude) were extracted from each recording and served as key predictors in the identification of a response. Twenty-three supervised machine-learning algorithms, with a 10-fold cross-validation procedure, were implem...

Keywords: frequency; machine learning; brain waves; response

Journal Title: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.