LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Call to halt heart trial raises vexing questions.

Photo by freestocks from unsplash

Charging that thousands of patients are being misled and may be unnecessarily placed at increased risk of death, a U.S. watchdog group last week demanded that federal regulators suspend a… Click to show full abstract

Charging that thousands of patients are being misled and may be unnecessarily placed at increased risk of death, a U.S. watchdog group last week demanded that federal regulators suspend a major clinical trial exploring when to offer blood transfusions after a heart attack. The group, Public Citizen in Washington, D.C., expressed concern about “regulatory and ethical lapses,” but the trial’s organizers and backers denied that accusation and defended it as necessary to answer a key question that hospitals face every day. The resulting debate among cardiologists, ethicists, and trial designers underscores vexing issues in clinical medicine.

Keywords: halt heart; trial; heart; call halt; trial raises; heart trial

Journal Title: Science
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.