LAUSR

This study aims at determining molecular candidates using comparative genomics to differentiate between the diphtheritic and cutaneous forms of FPV infection, in addition to their association with the pathogenicity of the virus. Full-genomic analyses of multiple fowlpox strains, including field viruses, isolated between 1960s and 2019, and vaccine strains showed the genetic diversity due to regional differences. ABSTRACT To determine the genomic variations of fowlpox virus (FPV)—the largest, very ancient, and still harmful avian virus—the complete genomes of 21 FPVs were analyzed. The genomes showed low genetic diversity relative to their overall size. Our studies revealed that FPVs could phylogenetically be divided into two clades, based on their regional distribution, and comparative analysis showed that 40 putative proteins of FPV were associated with geographic differences in viruses, viral pathogenicity, or the onset of diphtheritic lesions. The strain, classified into a subgroup different from others in the genomic analysis, showed relatively low pathogenicity in chickens, and the onset of diphtheritic lesions was observed to be caused only by the specific strain. Despite genetic differences, some commercial vaccines are protective against virulent strains, and intact reticuloendotheliosis virus inserted into field FPV strains was activated but there was no enhancement of the pathogenicity of FPV. These findings will expand our knowledge of the viral proteome and help us understand the pathogenicity of FPV. IMPORTANCE This study aims at determining molecular candidates using comparative genomics to differentiate between the diphtheritic and cutaneous forms of FPV infection, in addition to their association with the pathogenicity of the virus. Full-genomic analyses of multiple fowlpox strains, including field viruses, isolated between 1960s and 2019, and vaccine strains showed the genetic diversity due to regional differences. Comparative genomic analysis offered the clues related to viral virulence. We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because we are the first to perform such an elaborate study that compares 21 FPVs to study and highlight their diversity, despite the high level of homology between them. Our results shall help provide insights for tackling FPV that has been taking a toll on the poultry for years now.