LAUSR

The validity of HPV ctDNA as a marker of HPV-driven cancers has been previously reported. Herein we validated an alternative to ddPCR for HPV16 ctDNA detection, using a bead-based HPV genotyping assay that offers the potential advantage of reducing the cost of clinical management due to the multiplex capability of the test, thus facilitating its use in clinical settings. ABSTRACT Human papillomavirus (HPV) circulating tumor DNA (HPV ctDNA) was proposed as a biomarker for the detection and disease monitoring of HPV-related cancers. One hundred eighty plasma samples obtained from women diagnosed with HPV16-positive cervical cancer (CC) (n = 100), HPV16-positive premalignant lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 [CIN3]) (n = 20), and HPV DNA-negative controls (n = 60) were randomly selected from the archives for evaluating the performance of a bead-based HPV genotyping assay (E7 type-specific multiplex genotyping assay [E7-MPG]) in detecting HPV16 ctDNA. The performance of the E7-MPG was compared with those of DNA detection by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and detection of HPV16 E6 antibodies evaluated in an independent study. Internal controls to assess DNA quality were included in the molecular assays, i.e., beta-globin and ESR1, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of E7-MPG and/or E6 antibodies to detect HPV16-positive CCs were evaluated. HPV16 ctDNA was detected using the E7-MPG in 42.3% of all plasma samples and in 74.7% of plasma samples from HPV16-positive CC cases. The validation of E7-MPG data by ddPCR showed that the sensitivity of the E7-MPG test for HPV16-positive CC detection was higher than that of ddPCR (74.7% versus 63.1%; P < 0.001). When both HPV16 ctDNA and E6 antibodies were considered, the sensitivity for HPV16-positive CC detection increased from 74.7% to 86.1%, while the specificity was unchanged at 97.8%. The performance of E7-MPG for the detection of HPV16 ctDNA appears to be at least as sensitive as that of ddPCR, offering an additional tool for ctDNA detection of HPV16-positive CC. The use of an additional blood marker of HPV infection, such as E6 antibodies, further improved the detection of CC. IMPORTANCE The validity of HPV ctDNA as a marker of HPV-driven cancers has been previously reported. Herein we validated an alternative to ddPCR for HPV16 ctDNA detection, using a bead-based HPV genotyping assay that offers the potential advantage of reducing the cost of clinical management due to the multiplex capability of the test, thus facilitating its use in clinical settings. In addition, we analyzed HPV ctDNA in the context of E6 antibodies as an additional HPV marker. The HPV16 ctDNA biomarker appeared to be highly specific and, to a lesser extent, sensitive for the detection of CC, mainly indicated for those at an advanced tumor stage. In this proof-of-principle study, E6 antibodies were mainly detected in early tumor stages of CC, while HPV ctDNA was mainly positive at advanced tumor stages.