LAUSR

Latitudinal gradients of forest soil fungal biodiversity in China have been previously investigated; however, the results of these studies were inconsistent. In the present study, I reanalyzed the data from these studies on all forest types in China and showed that the differences in forest soil fungal latitudinal diversity were caused by the different environments of continents and islands, as well as by the inconsistency between different classification standards. ABSTRACT To identify the reasons for the inconsistency in patterns of latitudinal gradients of forest soil fungal biodiversity in China, a reanalysis of data was performed. Causes are linked to the different environments of continents and islands and the inconsistency between different classification standards. The following three suggestions are made for future studies: sites on the mainland and islands should be distinguished in these types of studies, the Shannon index should be used to represent fungal diversity instead of operational taxonomic unit (OTU) richness, and using the diversity of higher taxa (such as family level) instead of OTU level represents a potential proxy for species-level diversity. IMPORTANCE Latitudinal gradients of forest soil fungal biodiversity in China have been previously investigated; however, the results of these studies were inconsistent. In the present study, I reanalyzed the data from these studies on all forest types in China and showed that the differences in forest soil fungal latitudinal diversity were caused by the different environments of continents and islands, as well as by the inconsistency between different classification standards. Accordingly, three suggestions were outlined for future studies on this and similar topics. This study makes a significant contribution to the literature because these findings can be used to improve our understanding of the forest soil fungal latitudinal diversity and as a basis for future studies.