LAUSR

Despite that the influence of soil structure and fertilizer treatments on the bacterial community has been widely studied, how they drive interspecies interactions has not been largely explored. Connectance and nestedness were significantly correlated with bacterial interactions, but no differences were found in different soil aggregates and fertilizer treatments. ABSTRACT Bacterial interactions play significant roles in ecological functions in responding to anthropogenic interference and soil structure changes. However, it remains largely unknown how fertilizer regimes and soil particle sizes drive bacterial interactions. To evaluate bacterial interaction patterns in soil aggregates under long-term fertilizer treatments, we sampled nine bacterial co-occurrence communities and compared the difference between interspecies resource consumption patterns and network structure. Despite the differences between fertilizer treatments, the negative correlation ratios of interaction networks in soil aggregates were macroaggregates > microaggregates > silt + clays. Likewise, NPK-supplement (chemical fertilizer) had also decreased the number of positive correlations of the interaction network than M-supplement (organic fertilizer), regardless of the size of soil aggregates. Linear model analysis revealed that interspecies trophic patterns, including niche overlap and nestedness, drove bacterial competition in the interaction networks. Most importantly, interspecies niche overlap may be the intrinsic factor in the effects of fertilizer treatments and soil aggregates on bacterial interactions. This study enhances our understanding of the potential for changes in species trophic patterns and might guide the promotion of land management. IMPORTANCE Despite that the influence of soil structure and fertilizer treatments on the bacterial community has been widely studied, how they drive interspecies interactions has not been largely explored. Connectance and nestedness were significantly correlated with bacterial interactions, but no differences were found in different soil aggregates and fertilizer treatments. However, interspecies niche overlap could respond to soil aggregates and fertilizer treatments and ultimately drive the bacterial interactions. This study enhances our understanding of the mechanism of microbial interactions and highlights the importance of trophic patterns in the bacterial community. Our findings extend knowledge for nutrient availability on interspecific interactions.